Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 2GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 260W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
4416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 2 +2683%
12.86 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
72
192
Shading Units
4608
64
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.9 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
401.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
25.71 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.86 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
401.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
260W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
TU102
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy