Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm +751%
3.935 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
2688
64
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GK110
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

108W
TDP
235W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy