Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 142W)
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1792GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.86GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition +5%
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jun 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
8
192
Shading Units
256
64
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
142W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GF100
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy