Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA L40 CNX

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA L40 CNX

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 24GB VRAM L40 CNX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 300W)
NVIDIA L40 CNX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2475MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
17984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
L40 CNX +19374%
89.97 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Oct 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1005 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2475 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
142
192
Shading Units
18176
64
TMUs
568
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
475.2 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1406 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
89.97 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
89.97 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1406 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
AD102
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
AD102-???-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
4 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
608 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy