Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
24
192
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GT200B
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy