Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4100M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro K4100M +252%
1.627 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
1152
64
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.94 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.78 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.627 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.78 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GK104
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
N15E-Q3-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

108W
TDP
100W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy