Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M +204%
1.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Dec 2015
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
55W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GM107
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy