Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile +691%
3.656 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1575 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
16
192
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
60W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
TU117
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy