Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 16GB VRAM Tesla P100 SXM2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 300W)
NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
3392 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
Tesla P100 SXM2 +2196%
10.61 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1328 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
56
192
Shading Units
3584
64
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
142.1 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
331.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.22 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.61 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.304 TFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GP100
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
GP100-890-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
6.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy