Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800M
0.422 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q +442%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
128
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
43.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
422.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GK104
N10E-GLM3-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy