Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
6528 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800M
0.422 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210 +5262%
22.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Dec 2021
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
64GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
104
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
6656
64
TMUs
416
16
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
43.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
422.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
Aldebaran
N10E-GLM3-B2
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy