Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs NVIDIA Tesla K40t

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs NVIDIA Tesla K40t

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40t to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 245W)
NVIDIA Tesla K40t 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock876MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800M
0.422 TFLOPS
Tesla K40t +1095%
5.046 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Nov 2013
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
745 MHz
-
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
128
Shading Units
2880
64
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
43.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
422.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GK110B
N10E-GLM3-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
245W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy