NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380M and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (5GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
2480 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380M
0.047 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c
+7397%
3.524 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
320bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
2496
8
TMUs
208
4
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.424 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
4.848 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
46.98 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
GK110
N10M-GLM
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.2
CUDA
3.5
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
