NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 SDI and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
4000 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 154W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600 SDI
0.23 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+7200%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
24
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
-
-
96 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
154W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
