Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (67.20GB/s vs 34.14GB/s)
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 16 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 768GB)
416 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 134W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB +178%
0.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro FX
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
LPDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
34.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
4
96
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
16
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1280 GFLOPS
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
640.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
320.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

134W
TDP
10W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
GA10B
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
90 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
Unknown
484 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy