NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (67.20GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 768GB)
96 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000M
+83%
0.422 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
4
96
Shading Units
192
24
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
55W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GF106
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
