NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
3488 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16
+4247%
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
56
96
Shading Units
3584
24
TMUs
224
24
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
TU102
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
