NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+1489%
3.656 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1575 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
16
96
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
60W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
TU117
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
