NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Quadro GP100 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1442MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
3488 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Quadro GP100
+4395%
10.34 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1304 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1442 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
56
96
Shading Units
3584
24
TMUs
224
24
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.4 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
323.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.67 TFLOPS
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.34 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
5.168 TFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
235W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GP100
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
6.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
