Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
4512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +6391%
14.93 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1230 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
72
96
Shading Units
4608
24
TMUs
288
24
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
155.5 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
466.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.86 TFLOPS
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.93 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
466.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

134W
TDP
260W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
TU102
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy