Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
More VRAM (768GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (67.20GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (65W vs 134W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600 +81%
0.23 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
6
96
Shading Units
48
24
TMUs
24
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
96 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

134W
TDP
65W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
G94
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy