Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (67.20GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 768GB)
288 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 134W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Quadro K620 +275%
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1058 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.98 GTexel/s
-
-
-
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

134W
TDP
45W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
GM107
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
GM107-850-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy