NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro M5000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.6GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
1952 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Quadro M5000
+1748%
4.252 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Jun 2015
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
861 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
211.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
2048
24
TMUs
128
24
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
66.43 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.9 GTexel/s
-
-
-
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.252 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
132.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GM204
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
GM204-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
