Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
1952 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 134W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded +2277%
5.468 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
435 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
16
96
Shading Units
2048
24
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS

Board Design

134W
TDP
20W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
GA107S
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
90 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net