NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
1824 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
+2203%
5.299 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
945 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
30
96
Shading Units
1920
24
TMUs
120
24
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
165.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
80W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
TU106
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
