Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100B to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
6816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
GRID A100B +5939%
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
108
96
Shading Units
6912
24
TMUs
432
24
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Board Design

134W
TDP
400W
300 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
GA100
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy