Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 vs NVIDIA GRID K520

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 vs NVIDIA GRID K520

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 4700 X2 and 4GB VRAM GRID K520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K520 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 226W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4700 X2
0.384 TFLOPS
GRID K520 +496%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2008
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
128
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GK104
G92-880-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

226W
TDP
225W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy