Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 4700 X2 and 3GB VRAM Tesla M2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2050 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 226W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4700 X2
0.384 TFLOPS
Tesla M2050 +168%
1.03 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2008
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
128
Shading Units
448
64
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.10 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1030 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
515.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GF100
G92-880-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

226W
TDP
225W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy