Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 4700 X2 and 16GB VRAM Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (226W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (897.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
4992 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4700 X2
0.384 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB +3980%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2008
Release Date
Mar 2018
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1327 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
876 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
897.0GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
128
Shading Units
5120
64
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GV100
G92-880-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

226W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy