NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA A10M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 24GB VRAM A10M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
6976 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
A10M
+4973%
23.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Feb 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1635 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
56
192
Shading Units
7168
64
TMUs
224
24
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.8 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
366.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.44 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.44 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
732.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
