Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M +62%
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
576
64
TMUs
48
24
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
192 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy