CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
Intel Arctic Sound-M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
8000 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
+3092%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
VS
Arctic Sound M
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
8192
64
TMUs
256
24
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
192 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
500W
450 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
55 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
2
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450
3
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
4
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
5
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI
6
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Tesla K80
7
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550
8
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Tesla K20X
9
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000
10
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB
Related News
1
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
2
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
3
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
4
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
5
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
6
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
7
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
8
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
9
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
10
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy