Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro 7000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro 7000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 6GB VRAM Quadro 7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 204W)
NVIDIA Quadro 7000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (163.4GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro 7000 +188%
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
May 2012
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
851 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
163.4GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.23 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
204W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy