Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Quadro GP100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1442MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
3392 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro GP100 +2138%
10.34 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1304 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1442 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
56
192
Shading Units
3584
64
TMUs
224
24
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.4 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
323.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.67 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.34 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.168 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
235W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GP100
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
6.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy