Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (108W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 5600
0.346 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200 +508%
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
784 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
1344
32
TMUs
112
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
96 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
-
-
345.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Board Design

171W
TDP
108W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
GK104
G80-875-A2
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.0
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy