Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 5600 +367%
0.346 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 320M
0.074 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro FX
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
128
Shading Units
32
32
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
96 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
345.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.60 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
G84
G80-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

171W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy