CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 570 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1358MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 570
0.029 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile
+23875%
6.953 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 570
VS
RTX A2000 Mobile
Graphics Card
Sep 2007
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
893 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1358 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
20
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
2560
8
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.18 GPixel/s
3.680 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.953 TFLOPS
29.44 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.953 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
108.6 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GA106
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
12 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²
Board Design
38W
TDP
95W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
2
NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
3
NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
4
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
5
NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
6
NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
7
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
8
NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB
9
NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB
10
NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy