Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 580 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
5088 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 580
0.072 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216 +21663%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1312 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
80
32
Shading Units
5120
16
TMUs
320
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G96C
GPU Name
GV100
G96-875-C1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy