Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 and 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (189W vs 260W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
4368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 5800
0.622 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 4 +1967%
12.86 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
72
240
Shading Units
4608
80
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.9 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
401.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
25.71 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.86 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
401.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

189W
TDP
260W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy