Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1296 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 189W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 5800
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro K5100M +280%
2.369 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
1536
80
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.67 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.69 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.369 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.69 GFLOPS

Board Design

189W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q5-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy