Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K610M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K610M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (30W vs 189W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 5800 +65%
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro K610M
0.376 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
192
80
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.920 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.68 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
376.3 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
15.68 GFLOPS

Board Design

189W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GK208
-
GPU Variant
N15M-Q2-B-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy