Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
232 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Lower TDP (23W vs 189W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 5800 +2861%
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
May 2009
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
1
240
Shading Units
8
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

189W
TDP
23W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
G98
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy