Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 770M and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
5088 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 770M
0.08 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216 +19487%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1312 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
80
32
Shading Units
5120
16
TMUs
320
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
8.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
GV100
NB9P-GLM2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Volta
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy