Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1543MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
1744 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Mobile +4667%
5.53 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1328 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1543 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
1792
16
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.75 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
86.41 GFLOPS
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.530 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
172.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GP104
N10P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy