Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M and 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 40W)
NVIDIA Quadro P600 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1557MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.13GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
336 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
Quadro P600 +931%
1.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1329 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1557 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
3
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.91 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.37 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.68 GFLOPS
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1196 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
37.37 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GP107
N10P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
40W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy