Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 140W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
5840 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Mobile +15124%
17.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
46
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
5888
16
TMUs
184
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
276.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.66 TFLOPS
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.66 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
276.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GA104
N10P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
140W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy