Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
8144 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M +12615%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
8192
16
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
N10P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
8 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy