Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

NVIDIA Quadro K1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K1000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1000M +201%
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
48
16
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GT216
N14P-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
32W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy