Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K1000M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K1000M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K1000M and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 140W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
5696 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1000M
0.326 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Mobile +5317%
17.66 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K1000M
21
RTX A4500 Mobile +15376%
3250
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
46
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
5888
16
TMUs
184
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
276.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.66 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.66 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
276.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GA104
N14P-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
140W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy