Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K100M vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

NVIDIA Quadro K100M vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K100M and 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 295W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
5952 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K100M
0.326 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7900 +18709%
61.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Apr 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
96
192
Shading Units
6144
16
TMUs
384
8
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
96
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
128 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
122.6 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.32 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.916 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Navi 31
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Kepler
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
295W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy